Luminescence  
history about dr. pettit cost contact
|
micro laser peel
Foto Facial
Laser Hair Removal
Botox
Juvederm
Restylane
Laser Wrinkle Reduction
microdermabrasion
Skin Care
Spider Vein Treatment
VIPeel
Latisse treatments phoenix
Sciton Treatments
Body Slimming
Specials
News Center

 

Luminescence opened its doors in August 1999 as a comprehensive laser center. Initially we started with just the lasers to treat spider veins and hair removal. Since that time we have expanded to a comprehensive aesthetic medical center. Although we have grown, we have never changed our philosophy. When you schedule an appointment to see Dr. Pettit for his opinion, you see him. When you arrive for your care, you will be treated by him. His personal touch sets Luminescence above all other aesthetic centers. He values your time and confidence

The next time you consider an aeshetic procedure, look at the door. Is there a doctor listed? Who do you see? If the doctor is busy doing other things or seeing other people do you really want to be treated there? Give Dr. Pettit a call, you will receive the respect you deserve.


Dr. Pettit has been an active voice in the discussion of indirect vs. direct supervision while perfoming laser procedures. He has had the unfortunate opportunity of correcting mistakes made by indirectly supervised, non medical trained personel performing laser procedures.

Out of concern for medical safety of the public Dr. Pettit has chosen to support the following organizations in their fight to require direct medical supervision of all laser procedures. The following are all excerpts of letters written to the Arizona Radiation Regulatory Agency.


ArMA - Arizona Medical Association

“ The Arizona Medical Association (ArMA) opposes our new defenition of “indirect supervision” as presented in your proposed Administrative Rules package governing radiographic equipment.

We are, however, supportive of the “direct supervision” defenition in your initial rider proposal and believe its application will both benefit te public and clarify the issues of use of intense-pulsed light devices and lasers...”

David Landrith, Vice President
Policy and Political Affairs


Arizona State Board of Medical Examiners

“It is our belief that as a presecriptive device, the use and/or treatment of a patient with an intense pulsed light and/or laser device should be performed only by prescription of a physician duly licensed to practice medicine in Arizona, unless the physician delegates these functions to trained individuals that perform these tasks under “direct supervision” of the prescribing physician....”

Patrick N. Connel, M.D.
Chairman


Arizona Board of Osteopathic Examiners in Medicine and Surgery

“The Board opposes your agency’s new defenition of “indirect supervision” as presented in your proposed Administrative Rules package governing radiographic equipment.

The Board does support our defenition of “direct supervision” that was in you initial rules proposal. The board feels that this would provide better protection for the public relating to the use of lasers and intense-pulsed light devices. ...”

Martin B. Reiss, D.O.
President

 

©2005 Luminescence | 480.785.1746 | 16515 S 40th St, Suite #139 | Phoenix, Arizona 85048
Luminescence